Assessment of analytical methods
in the theory of eternal existence
A scientist, creating his theory, first examines a given phenomenon to substantiate the assumption. Then, presenting the thesis, he defines his research possibilities. After all, he does the most important part of the job, i.e. he checks the results of the research against the truth of the assumptions and thesis he has set himself. Scientists have shown many times that even the most difficult tasks can be solved over time, even if they seem impossible to solve at first. With the same attitude, the analytical system of essenceism prepared the task of knowing the Creator of the universe for the theory of eternal existence. My theory took over the tasks of essenceism to end the treatment of the "religious" God as an omnipresent "spirit" participating in the space of our world. The theory of eternal existence cannot be based on "fake" views. The Creator cannot be an "imaginary god" who is unknowable.
The search for the Creator, the search for the meaning of life, or the creation of a specific theory required a lot of effort not only by me, but also by people who supported me. On my part and on their part, this entailed giving up my previous religious views. In trying to understand a state beyond time and space, current scientific views had to be re-examined. However, despite these difficulties, I recommend everyone to make a bold change in their knowledge of spiritual life. However, I advise against starting this path from chaotic criticism of the existing achievements of other people in this field. I also do not recommend criticism without scientific findings.
The methods of religion rely on the fact that they base their claims on revelations or visions they have accepted, that is, on something that cannot be tested. In the next steps, they are built up with further theorems, the roots of which lie in the concepts accepted on faith. This builds a religious chain of faith and worship.
In order not to disregard the facts with faith in such an important matter as eternity, it is good to have a strong foundation of knowledge, a kind of base on which to properly investigate a phenomenon that defies science. That is why I created the analytical system essenceism, through which I wanted to help people build an inner foundation in themselves, which is necessary to shape views related to the knowledge of eternity. Below I will explain my intentions using specific examples.
When a car mechanic starts to repair a broken vehicle, he must have a lot of knowledge, that is, knowledge of the laws of general mechanics, knowledge of the design and operation of the mechanisms of a given type and model of car. Added to this is the necessary experience related to the repair of typical car damage. Similar rules apply to a doctor who starts treating a sick patient. Such a doctor must have general medical knowledge at an appropriate level, must have sufficient knowledge of the functioning of the human body and have experience in treating various types of diseases.
If you want to analyze the rich experiences of humanity in areas that concern the existence of God, the meaning of life or specific religious views, it is worth taking the example of a good car mechanic or a good doctor. For there is no doubt that our world is to a large extent sick and seriously corrupted morally, just as a person can be sick or an old car can be broken. Therefore, when starting to repair or renew our spiritual life, as well as to positively influence our environment, it is worth shaping the basic foundation of knowledge about what we want to do and what is the purpose of our conduct.
In my case, the basis of everything was the full conviction of the necessity of a "scientific" First Cause. This marked the beginning of building new views for me. This is how the idea of the Original Being was created. So it was worth spending some time realizing God as an absolute, eternal, perfect and good Being. This assumption results from the totality of human achievements less in the field of religion, but more in the field of science. This Initial Being must have the attributes of Intelligence, Will and Emotionality, of course on a cosmic scale. In this concept, His Intellect means omniscience, perfection and infinity. His Will results in the creation of an ideal environment for humanity, i.e. the Kingdom of Heaven as the highest good. It is also worth realizing that His Emotionality flowing from His Heart should generate the power of love that builds an ideal world. Therefore, such a concept of the Creator's features, attributes and attributes can allow everyone to form the right idea of what an ideal world should look like for humanity. By the way, it gives the opportunity to assess the mechanisms of evil destroying good. Of course, the experience of an active social activist would also be useful. For the more zealous, I would recommend gaining experience as a volunteer, for the even more zealous, the knowledge and skills of a lay missionary in some organization helping people. Maybe then we would become similar in our activity to an experienced mechanic or an effective doctor.
Often on the Internet you can see random criticism from people who have nothing to offer but dislike for a person with different views. I am not talking about the so-called Internet haters, because there is no discussion with them. I am talking about people speaking in public debate who are often afraid to open their hearts wider. I am also talking about staunch adherents of some religious denomination who, on principle, reject anything that does not agree with their views. Finally, I am talking about people who preach great and lofty slogans, the content of which they do not really understand, because they practically do not apply the ideas they preach in their personal lives. If you meet such people, you probably won't learn anything new, but you will only expose your nerves to stressful experiences.
However, it is worth discussing with an experienced doctor or a good car mechanic, that is, it is worth discussing with a person who really has something specific to say and who willingly listens to us. Therefore, one should start a religious discussion having a preliminary foundation of rational knowledge and at least a minimal base of knowledge about the views of other religious denominations. Having your own "backbone" is important not to be fooled or misled by empty slogans and to be analytically oriented towards the statements of discussion partners. There is a general rule that you should test every new theory well, starting with your own. Therefore, I proposed to everyone to create their own "analytical tools", in which I help as far as possible after applying essenceism to the creation of the theory of eternal existence. Many times in my statements I suggested people not to stop searching for their own way in getting to know God. Ideally, the path to this goal should be based on independent and logical thinking. It would also be useful to have a deep desire to know Someone who should exist somewhere out there and whom countless researchers of the Truth have sought before us.
Perhaps now is the time to do so?
So, is it good to decide to search for the universal truth about God, man and the universe on your own? Certainly, yes! None of us should do this important life task, although it is difficult to get down to it. However, once again, I suggest that you first undertake to develop your own, independent vision of God, and only then proceed to compare it with other people. Many times in various texts I showed how I did it myself and what was the result. I will definitely continue to show what can be achieved if you really want something. That is why I have been publishing the results of essenceism analyzes in the public space for many years, to now show the refined theory of eternal existence. This is why the study presented here was created.