Ch.1,2,3,4

Chapters from the book "Essenceism 6 - Unreal gods from this world": Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4.

Chapter 1

Types of imaginary gods

(First I will list the kinds of gods whose names have resulted from my analysis. The second part will present the results of the activities of various creators of religious systems from the last century.)

Private God - shaped by a given person.

An ideal, dream God - one that people would like to have for themselves.

God fictitious, that is, as it should be to fit human fictional image.

An imaginary God - fitting human imaginations - a god "in the image and likeness of man".

God preached by religious and secular power - suitable for people of both religious and political power. This is what it should be, so that they can reign over people, control them based on God’s qualities and use people hopes.

Intentional God - a god existing in the creative imagination of man, created in human consciousness, that is, the one that should be according to the intention of the creator of a given concept.

God Absolute - a perfect god, personal or impersonal, eternally existing in an absolute way, independent of anything.

God the Creator - a perfect being who caused the existence of the world and people.

Pantheistic God - the impersonal god of the world, the eternal absolute identified with everything that exists, but does not interfere with the world.

Deistic God - the constructor of the world who made it function as a mechanism, i.e. the source and eternal state of reality. Such an impersonal god does not interfere with the created world.

Theistic God - God (or gods) involved in the fate of the world, most often created by himself, watching over people and judging them.

Tribal God - worked out as a result of the earliest experiences of ancient and modern peoples, such as, for example, Arab tribes - e.g. Allah.

National God - created to care for a given nation, for example Israel - for example, Yahweh.

God appointed by religious leaders - that is, as established by the hierarchy of a religion - applies, for example, to Jesus Christ.

Christian God - a typical theistic God, Heavenly Father in the form of Holy Trinity, perfect, eternal, absolute, creator of the world, constantly present, all-knowing, controlling and judging everything.

Mohammedan God - Presented by Muhammad Lord of the Worlds - Allah.

... and other gods not mentioned here...

In the essenceism system, I present the Creator God described by myself as The Original Being - eternal, absolute and perfect, which, due to the existence of evil on Earth, is not directly present in the state of our civilization.

In the late nineteenth century, and into the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, it means about our last century, there appeared many preachers of religious ideas, in which I became interested in. Most often they were very spiritual people who had some visions or revelations behind them. They were quite often accepted by the so-called crowds of people, which was not always good for them. Of course, I do not count among them the authors and philosophers who present their views mostly through the university. I list below some of the spiritual gurus I know, although I cannot put their ideas into alphabetical or time order. I also attached one book of undefined authorship.

Mirza Gulan Ahmad (1835-1908) - Islamic reformer, thinker and guru, presenting himself as the Promised Messiah. He and his achievements have been presented to me in detail in the form of several articles by his followers. As a messiah, he did not convince me of his views.

Oskar Ernst Bernhardt (also known as Abdrushin), (1875-1941) - German businessman and writer, author of the large work "In the Light of Truth", with which I struggled for many months. His followers recognized him as the Son of Man and worshiped him. The subjective descriptions of the world contained in his work and the belief in reincarnation are difficult for me to accept.

Merwan Sheriar Bani, Meher Baba (1894-1965). This guru treated himself as the incarnation of God. He started his own religious group in his early days, but then fell silent and talked by pointing to letters on special tablets. However, it is difficult to learn anything from the "silent holy man."

Jiddu Krishnamurti (1895-1987) - Indian teacher with a very rich biography. I read several of his lectures, wanting to explain the most important things for mankind. From the richness of his words, only individual advice can be derived, hence, unfortunately, I could not find in them basic solutions regarding the knowledge of God and important problems of humanity.

Martinus (1890-1981) - Danish writer and thinker, author of a number of works under the common title "Third Testament". He did not create any religious denomination, but presented a series of logical analyzes of reality. I spent many hours on his concepts, although they lacked a clear vision of the rise and existence of evil. Unfortunately, I cannot accept his understanding of human existence based on reincarnation.

Sai Baba (1926-2011) is a Hindu guru, treated almost like God by his followers. I looked through a book borrowed from one of his followers about the views of this religious leader called "Sai Baba Speaks to the West." I found in it a lot of beautiful teachings, slogans and ideas related to proper morality, and of course, reincarnation and meditation. It's such a better Buddhism with faith in the omnipresent God. As a scientist, it is difficult for me to accept it all.

Sun Myung Moon (1920-2012) - Korean religious leader, viewed by followers as a messiah. The creator of the religious work "The Divine Principle", in which I found many logical analyzes of God's activities. For a long time I was present in various activities of the religious movement he founded and participated in many scientific conferences organized by the Society of Scholars for World Peace that he founded. After his death, his work was dispersed and fell short of the expectations of those who believed in him.

Rajneesh Chandra Mohan Jain also known as Osho (1931-1990) - Indian spiritual master and author of the controversial book "From Sex to the Superconscious" that I read. I was interested in the criticism of all faith and the search for freedom from any commands and dogmas. I was rejected from him by the conflicts and moral scandals he caused. This is not how a spiritual master should act.

Guru Maharaja Dzi (born in 1958) - a young charismatic guru attracting crowds of believers. He creates himself as a holy man equal to the gods. It's not for me.

Bulent Corak Mevlana (born in 1923) and her "Book of Knowledge" written in the years 1981-1993. This Turkish spiritual guru has created a truly enormous work of transmitting secret knowledge from other dimensions. I have read excerpts from her work available to the public in Polish and I would classify it as fantasy, not scientific, but metaphysical.

"Book of URANTI" - was written in the years 1924-1955. It is a powerful religious work covering the history of the creation of universes, the structure of the spiritual world and the history of mankind to the present day. This book deals with such a variety of topics that it is difficult to define it as scientific, religious or philosophical. I have been struggling with it for many months, but I am still incapable of accepting any views from it.

Summation

I must admit, unfortunately, that any experience with the above ideologies has had no effect whatsoever on my current scientific and religious views. Rather, they showed me what they shouldn't be.

I would like to clarify that my system of essenceism does not create any religion, does not impose any dogmas, or create any kind of cult. So do the clergy. However, it points out to religious hierarchs and political leaders that they are responsible for repairing our world, i.e. freeing our world from evil. My system also shows that God is a perfect Being who has activated His perfect work once and for all. It inevitably tends to be perfect. Although mankind has interrupted this development, sooner or later the Creator's work will be completed sooner or later. My system is therefore used to understand the original concept of the Creator towards the universe and to apply it to repair the reality that surrounds us.

Chapter 2

The persistence of religious gods

Modern religions have inherited a vision of a god from antiquity and then merged him with a medieval god. For example, Christianity inherited the God of Yahweh from ancient Israel. So a "religious" God was created, who knows everything, sees everything, manages everything and takes care of people. He normally does it without them knowing, but when they ask for it, he can increase that care.

Thus, a "religious" god is a sum of the ancient gods who were involved in human affairs, each with a specialty. There were gods from happiness, love, rain, lost things and many other things. Parallel to these gods came the Israeli Yahweh, that is, the invisible god destined for one chosen people. Jesus' efforts to present the correct image of God as the Father of all mankind were, sadly, tragically interrupted after three years. No wonder then different visions of God emerged. As a result, the omnipresent, invisible, just and sometimes merciful Lord God was created as the Holy Trinity; although in different Christian varieties. The Islamic Allah also appeared at the same time. These images of God remain in the consciousness of most people on Earth to this day.

Essenceism was created to give hope to those who had already completely rejected the "religious" god and even became atheists. Perhaps some of them will still find some good will to be interested in the Original Being. This also applies to believers in various other "religious gods."

In its analysis, essenceism found that most of us feel in the dark when it comes to religious matters. We don't understand God, we don't know the meaning of our life and we don't take into account the fact that we are eternal. Besides, we do not realize that we are under Satan's power. In addition, we are sure that God Himself will save us someday. My system creates a chance that one day we will open our eyes to what surrounds us.

This "opening of the eyes" is primarily related to the salvation of mankind from evil. As a result, our civilization would free itself from the captivity of evil, that is, the reign of Satan. It would then experience the presence of the Original Being, which can be called "warmer" Heavenly Father. Essenceism, describing such a God, proclaims that every human being is faced with the prospect of an eternal presence in his surroundings after the end of his earthly life. It is worth taking advantage of this short earthly existence to prepare for this most important, or eternal, part of our life.

What I wrote above, although known to mankind for centuries, has not been properly implemented in our daily lives. This fact should be taken to heart by the people of the world's greatest religions. If they remain faithful to their "old" religious views, the world that is the original concept of the Creator will never come. The idea of a God who created the world of absolute good, a God who knows no evil, and a God who in this world destined us to reach perfection, will be lost. Understanding the perfect Original Being is to help people better understand the meaning of life.

Chapter 3

Adapting God to man

Essenceism took a special interest in the concept of the imaginary god, because such a term functions in public space, and was even used by the British scientist Richard Dawkins to describe the evil done to humanity by religions. In his book "God delusional" he tries with scientific tools to prove the fact of the non-existence of God. Until now it has been thought that science, unlike Mr. Dawkins' assertion, is unable to establish both the existence of God and the absence of God. Essenceism agrees with this approach of science and therefore disagrees with the claim of this British scholar. Hence, in essenceism, special research instruments were created that resemble scientific tools, although they are not themselves. They are primarily to enable the emergence of thought lines leading to the understanding of the possibility of God's existence as the Original Being. Based on practical knowledge of the universe, it can indeed be assumed that the religious denominations have created imaginary gods for their purposes, which they worship and present to their followers. However, the fact that such gods exist does not mean that God does not exist at all. This is the difference between Dawkins' claims and essenceism.

As I presented in the first book on essenceism, this system has prepared a set of research instruments to judge whether a god of a religion is imaginary or not. This delusion is most often spoken by atheists. However, later in this text, I will show that existing religions do more damage in this regard.

Many atheists fight religion as a negative phenomenon that has hit humanity. They argue that it is a peculiar disease of humanity caused by delusions or the desire for happiness. They also argue that in many cases it is the faith of naive people in the lies delivered by the clergy. As it is easy to guess, essenceism has looked at these accusations and concluded that they are only a cursory assessment of the activity of religion against the background of political and economic activities of mankind.

As we know, our civilization produces so much evil that it is necessary to repair it thoroughly. Political, economic or social activities are not able to change this state, but rather deepen it. Meanwhile, religion from the position of an advocate of good could help the world "from within" to return to the original concept of the Creator. The problem, however, is that the misunderstanding of this concept by individual religious denominations leads to different delusions of its followers. The example of this is Christianity. The present state of understanding of Christ's teachings, according to essenceism, has little to do with their actual content. Jesus clearly taught that God is outside our world, that is, in His Kingdom called Heaven. By introducing God into our reality and making Him an observer of life entangled in evil, Christian theologians have completely distorted His position towards us. Only the action of the evil power of authority can explain the fact of faith in God, who, being good and all-powerful, has been watching the evil destroying us and His work for millennia. This is a sign that people can be deceived to the point where they are incapable of freeing themselves from belief in an imaginary God. When Jesus taught about the unconditional love of Heavenly Father in the form of, among other things, the parable of the prodigal son, only the influence of Satan can explain the fact that Christian theologians made him a punishing Judge who analyzes and evaluates our sins. In order to facilitate the theological meanders of faith, they made the Son of God the third person of the so-called Holy Trinity, and therefore made God himself out of a man of the full value of the Son of God. The worst mistake of these theologians is to proclaim that Christ, through his death on the cross, saved mankind and deprived Satan of the main causative power. Apart from the fact that the commandment "you shall not kill" is in complete contradiction with the actions of people in Jesus' days, it is evident that evil before Jesus' coming is the same as it is today and Satan has not lost his power in any way. Anyway, our civilization shows that the salvation of the spiritual world that Jesus accomplished does not go hand in hand with the salvation of the physical world that surrounds us. Based on their wrong theories, Christian "scribes" can safely wait for Jesus to reappear as judge of the Last Judgment. Their main activity is to calm the faithful who wait for this vague moment that no one knows. It is, of course, the so-called end of the world and the Last Judgment. This attitude, in the face of tremendous effort and sacrifice on the part of Jesus Christ, is grossly inappropriate and unfair. So mankind, if not instructed in the misinterpretation of salvation by religious beliefs, will be left to suffer eternally under Satan's rule. No human theories will force the Creator to begin to correct a state with which, as a perfect Original Being, it has nothing to do with. It is He who is waiting for us to finally make the Earth the place of the coming of His Kingdom.

Therefore, a peculiar delusion of religion is introducing the perfect Creator into the evil and imperfect human environment, so that He would be with us, interfere when we ask Him for it, that is, deal with our requests every day, deciding which to listen to and which not. This creates a situation in which the Creator becomes a "pawn on a chessboard" formed by theologians creating their imaginary vision of the world. At the same time, they claim that God allows evil because He knows that He can transform evil into good. It appears to be manipulating God for the purpose of religious gain. Essenceism tries to explain these misconceptions so that God finally becomes real, not imaginary.

Essenceism concluded that the Original Being had a clear purpose in creating the universe. The analysis of the details found on the globe leads to the conclusion that the Creator refined His work in terms of the presence of humanity on it. Hence the conclusion that we live on a "buttoned up" planet that should be our home forever. God is a perfect Being who does not make mistakes, and therefore does not need to correct anything anymore. Everything on Earth has been prepared so that we can bring it and ourselves to a state of perfection. This is how one should understand the biblical statement that God rested after the symbolic six days of His "work". Essenceism adds to this the observation that the Creator, before the "well deserved rest", also organized our future life in His world beyond time and space, that is, in an ideal spiritual world. He's waiting for us there.

Chapter 4

God is not “owned” by religion

Usually a person tries to think logically. This is our nature and this is also my attitude as a researcher. I would like to understand as many things as possible. That is why I ask myself various questions, especially the most important ones.

Before essenceism arose, I really wanted to know who God is, what He is and where He is. As I analyzed the teachings of Jesus Christ and His advice on how to address Heavenly Father, I understood that God is in Heaven and that He is not with us on Earth. Additionally, the prayer suggested by the Son of God implied that God would finally appear among us. I recall how these words read: "Our Father who is in Heaven..." and "Your kingdom come...".

For a better understanding of our situation, I will add the information from John 6:38, in which Jesus said that He descended from Heaven to Earth.

Christianity interpreted this last sentence as literally leaving Heaven and descending to Earth. In this way, the Son of God would save the world. Therefore, this religion made Jesus God "integrated" with the state of the Holy Trinity. In practice, this meant that the Heavenly Father once, two thousand years ago, came to help people by sending Himself in Jesus. He did it as an act of mercy to help those tormented by Satan. Due to a different understanding of the martyrdom of Jesus and oblivious to Catholic dogmas, I have always tried to understand this fact. This was also one of the reasons for the emergence of essenceism.

It is worth considering where this Heaven is, because religions create a fairy-tale image of this place. So what is this "space" and where is it? According to the words of Jesus, it is not in our physical world. Given the present knowledge of the cosmos, it is also absent in the space-time of the universe. So it has to be outside of it. Essenceism has always seen God in the realm beyond time and space, and also called Him "scientifically" the Original Being. The Heavenly Father presented by Jesus must therefore have His Kingdom far enough away, since we only need to make efforts for it to "come to us". This is, of course, a metaphor, but essenceism clearly states that in our earthly civilization there is no God, and we can only dream of the Kingdom of Heaven.

The state beyond time and space can be called "religiously" the spiritual world, but it is not a "space" logically assessed by religions. In its theology, apart from Heaven, Christianity also places some purgatory and hell in this "space". Of course, these last two "institutions" do not fit a perfect God. Essenceism suggests that the spiritual world cannot be wholly recognized as "God's realm." Therefore, the name Heaven can only refer to the proper sphere beyond time and space, that is, to the primordial spiritual world, i.e. to the one that fills the Original Being with itself. Everything indicates that there are also beings serving man as angels. It seems logical and in this case in line with the religious vision. One problem is, are the fallen angels and Satan himself also staying there? In this regard, it is important to consider the biblical story that they were "thrown to earth." Judging logically in the history of human civilization, this "downfall" translates into a phenomenon that has resulted in a "fallen" earth environment full of evil, misfortunes, wars and many other terrible things for tens of thousands of years. It is as if Satan and his evil spirits were really here with us, so the Earth deserves to be called hell. This is what essenceism claims. Then we live in hell, and the "boss" of our civilization is Satan. The assessment of essenceism is very similar to the views of Jesus Christ, who called Satan "the god of this world," which makes the world a hell. So Heavenly Father is in Heaven, not here with us.

It is worth taking the words of Jesus Christ seriously and finally realizing that the Heaven we are looking for is the "home" of Heavenly Father and honestly admitting that He cannot be with us here on Earth.

Therefore, I remind you that the Creator started our universe using His Energy and His Laws. So He created everything from Himself, and it was not a miracle. It was simply the creative process of transforming His attributes into the material state of the universe. He may have created many more such universes, but so far we know about this one, which is ours. All His Laws and Principles were used to transform His Praenergy into the physical structure of the universe, and we ended up in it. Thus, the presence of the Original Being in the universe He created is only indirect. A similar situation is the indirect presence of an architect in a building designed by him.

Let us now turn our attention to ourselves. We often ask how "technically" the modern man who creates the present civilization on planet Earth appeared. When bacteria, insects, amphibians, fish and animals "are in development", humanity got a gigantic "impulse" because in the course of several thousand years we have made incredible progress in civilization. Something must have appeared within us other than that of all the other creatures. Essenceism equates this spurt of human civilization with the "breath of the Creator" that every human being receives at birth. My system calls this "breath" our spiritual person. It makes us people, that is, children of the Creator. Thanks to this, we become his heirs.

Everything I write above is to show that we are dealing more with a "scientific" God than with a "religious" God. The "Scientific" Original Being does not require worship, religious ceremonies and all the temples with which the whole world is guarded. It is simply our "ordinary" Father who prepared the space-time environment of the universe so that His children would reach perfection in it equal to Him, that is, to a state in His image and likeness.

I am writing all of this to show that there is no God represented by the world's religions. They form a fictional image of the Creator who sees everything, is everywhere and understands our imperfect life in an imperfect world. Through this wrong image of God, religious leaders can maintain their imaginary cults for centuries, taking advantage of their lack of proper knowledge of the Creator of the universe. Therefore, I argue that the spiritual development of mankind was stopped almost at the very beginning of our history. Then only the physical progress of our civilization took place. So we have a world that is inconsistent with the divine concept. This is one of the reasons we do not realize what our proper condition is.

Thus, essenceism, starting from the knowledge of the perfect concept of creation prepared by the Creator, draws the logical conclusion that the state of our civilization is at a very low spiritual level. Although we live in the 21st century in terms of technological development, our spiritual development has been standing still since we departed from the concept of the Creator almost at the very beginning of human history. I have explained this in my publications and websites. They show that we live in a world shaped by a tragedy that took place in the first years of humanity and which is symbolically described in the Bible in the form of events in the Garden of Eden. It was this event that to a large extent retained our knowledge about the Original Being, about His work and about ourselves. This translates directly into the fact that we are not aware of our eternity. This fact and the whole evil spiritual situation of mankind makes religion weak. Each of them has formed a "god" who does not actually exist. Therefore, through my system, I undertook the methods used in science to describe the Original Being, so that religions would know the image of God independent of faith. By presenting His scientific vision, essenceism wants to stimulate the activity of clergymen of various denominations, so that they constantly explain to their faithful that they are eternal children of God, that He does not know evil, that He is not with us on Earth. My system is also about making humanity supported by religions take responsibility for preparing the salvation of the world.